
First, it was determined that the Kingmaking applied only to games 3 or more players. Then defined as the Kingmaking: That the action that a player who is clearly unable to win the game (it is called the kingmaker ) realizes that allows another player to win. There are several levels:
- The player must make an action that will decide the winner of the game between several players,
- The player has no effect on how that could fix it and is therefore obliged to make a move that favors one of the other players,
- The player knows his next move will decide the winner of the game.

Personally, I do not play this game in spite of these undeniable qualities of play and atmosphere of his illustrations that make me laugh.
Information Sheet Canardage

In fact, some form of Kingmaking occurs when an experienced player in Bohnanza in our example, play with beginners. He can then manipulate them at will to accept that trade is not the same, or cards he wants to rid the pretext that they can not catch up at the score.
Information Sheet Bohnanza
All that for what? I realize that Kingmaking is a term used everywhere for the fart. In fact, if one refers to the exact definition, Kingmaking situations are rare for a game against the other, there are a lot of games that can bring this situation. I do
not know if I'm well put ... What I mean is that despite the fact that the Kingmaking be possible in many games, it is rarely implemented. What do you think? I am so far from the truth? Have you experienced situations Kingmaking?